Is removing surnames a better long-term strategy for ending caste-based reservation than continuing reservation indefinitely?
Caste-based reservation was created to address historical social discrimination and unequal access to education, employment and opportunities. However, a long-term debate is whether India should continue treating caste as a formal category indefinitely or work toward a society where caste no longer determines people’s opportunities. One proposed approach is to remove caste-identifying surnames and adopt a caste-neutral naming system, such as using a person’s first name followed by their father’s first name. The idea is that reducing the visibility of caste in everyday life could gradually weaken caste consciousness and discrimination.
Surnames can sometimes reveal caste and reinforce caste-based identity. Replacing surnames with a caste-neutral system, such as using the father’s first name, could reduce the visibility of caste in everyday life. If caste discrimination declines over generations, could this eventually make caste-based reservation unnecessary?
Propose a Solution for this Question
Sign in with GoogleNo solutions proposed yet.
Be the first citizen to propose an actionable solution!